OFAC Sanctions French Charities Over $2M in Crypto Transfers to Hamas
The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned two France-based charities and three individuals on October 2, 2026, alleging the organizations funneled more than $2 million in cryptocurrency to Hamas over a six-year period using humanitarian aid appeals as cover.
OFAC Sanctions French Charities Over $2M in Crypto Transfers to Hamas
The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned two France-based charities and three individuals on October 2, 2026, alleging the organizations funneled more than $2 million in cryptocurrency to Hamas over a six-year period using humanitarian aid appeals as cover.
The action, coordinated with French law enforcement, dismantled what officials describe as an international network of non-profit associations that systematically diverted donor funds to Hamas' military wing between 2020 and 2026. Five individuals have been indicted in France in connection with the scheme.
"French and U.S. law enforcement have dismantled an international network of non-profit associations accused of using humanitarian aid appeals to divert over $2 million to Hamas' military wing between 2020 and 2026."
Joint French-U.S. Law Enforcement Statement
According to OFAC, two French fundraisers sent hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency to a Hamas commander operating in Gaza. The charities solicited donations under the guise of humanitarian relief, then routed proceeds through crypto wallets to avoid the transaction monitoring that governs traditional bank transfers. OFAC's designation means any U.S. persons or entities holding assets connected to the named organizations or individuals must freeze them, and transacting with the sanctioned parties is now a federal violation.
Cryptocurrency's role in the alleged financing is notable but not surprising. Hamas and its affiliates have used digital assets to solicit donations since at least 2019, when the group publicly posted wallet addresses before major platforms and regulators pushed exchanges to block those addresses. The $2 million figure attributed to this network is modest relative to total illicit crypto flows tracked annually, but the Treasury's focus here is on organized infrastructure rather than one-off transactions. A network that can reliably convert public donations into battlefield funds while maintaining a legitimate-looking front represents a more durable threat than opportunistic wallet use.
The France-U.S. coordination reflects a broader shift in how Western governments approach crypto-enabled sanctions evasion. OFAC has accelerated its enforcement posture toward cryptocurrency since 2021, designating mixers, exchanges, and now non-profit networks that serve as conduits. The Tornado Cash designations in 2022 and subsequent prosecutions established that OFAC is willing to target infrastructure, not just end users. Sanctioning charities adds a new category: front organizations that weaponize donor trust.
Legitimate humanitarian organizations working in conflict zones will face downstream pressure. Compliance teams at crypto-accepting NGOs operating near sanctioned jurisdictions now face heightened scrutiny over their donor bases and wallet management practices. The case also reinforces that blockchain's transparency cuts both ways: the same immutable ledger that crypto advocates cite as a law enforcement tool was, in this instance, the evidence trail that helped investigators trace fund flows from French donors to a Hamas commander in Gaza.
The five French indictments signal that criminal prosecution, not just civil asset designation, is the preferred enforcement posture when a clear organizational structure can be proven. OFAC designations carry financial penalties and asset freezes; criminal charges carry prison terms. Using both in parallel maximizes pressure on any remaining network members and deters future participants.
For crypto market participants, the practical implication is continued regulatory tightening around charity-sector crypto transactions, particularly those touching the Middle East or other conflict-adjacent regions. Exchanges and payment processors should expect updated guidance from FinCEN (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) on enhanced due diligence for non-profit account holders, a category that has historically received lighter scrutiny than commercial clients.
Hamas remains designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the United States. Any material support to the group, including financial transfers, carries federal criminal exposure under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B regardless of the payment method used.





