12 Jul Where do US Presidential Candidates Stand on Crypto Policy?

In the 2024 United States presidential election, cryptocurrency has emerged as a pivotal issue influencing voter decisions and political campaign strategies. A significant portion of the electorate prioritises the stances on digital assets taken by each candidate, with many advocating for clear regulatory frameworks to foster industry growth. Major crypto firms are investing heavily in political campaigns to support pro-crypto candidates, particularly in key Senate races, highlighting the industry’s growing political clout. The election’s outcome could significantly impact the future of crypto regulation and the U.S.’s role in the global digital economy.

Crypto Emerges as an Important Issue in the 2024 Presidential Election

In our prior article, “Has Bitcoin Become Political?”, we speculated on the prospect of crypto becoming an important topic in critical political discourse. In the 2024 United States presidential election, cryptocurrency has become a significant and polarising issue. As millions head to the polls  in November, the stance of candidates on digital assets is proving to be a major consideration for a substantial portion of the electorate. This shift is driven by the increasing adoption and integration of crypto into daily life, making it a relevant topic for many voters. The rise of the crypto vote reflects a broader trend where digital assets and the principles of decentralisation are becoming central to political discussions.

A recent poll by the National Crypto Council revealed that around 80% of respondents consider a candidate’s position on cryptocurrency to be at least somewhat important to their vote. This highlights the growing importance of crypto policy in the political arena. Incredibly, 83% of crypto voters expressed a preference for candidates who support clear regulatory frameworks to foster industry growth and investor protection. This sentiment underscores the dissatisfaction with the current financial system and the desire for reform that many see as achievable through the adoption of cryptocurrencies.

The emergence of crypto as a political issue is not confined to voter preferences. The industry itself has become a formidable player, investing heavily in political campaigns and lobbying efforts. Major crypto firms like Ripple, Coinbase, and Andreessen Horowitz have pooled substantial resources to support pro-crypto candidates, regional Senate races. This strategic spending aims to influence policy and secure a favourable regulatory environment for the future of digital assets in the United States.

The 2024 election is shaping up to be a defining moment for the crypto industry. The differing attitudes of candidates towards digital assets could have far-reaching implications for the industry. A supportive administration could drive innovation, attract investment, and establish the U.S. as a leader in blockchain technology. On the other hand, restrictive policies might stifle growth and push the industry to more welcoming jurisdictions, abroad. As the political landscape evolves, the role of cryptocurrency in shaping the future of the U.S. economy and its position in the global digital assets economy cannot be overstated.

Where Do the Most Popular Presidential Candidates Stand on Crypto? 

Joe Biden

The Biden administration’s approach to the crypto industry has undergone a notable shift as the 2024 election approaches. Initially characterised by a heavy-handed regulatory stance, exemplified by actions like the proposal of a Digital Asset Mining Energy (DAME) excise tax and aggressive enforcement by the SEC against major exchanges and blockchain projects, the administration appeared intent on curbing the growth of the crypto sector. This tough line was part of a broader strategy to ensure that cryptocurrencies did not undermine financial stability, protecting investors by imposing strict regulations and discouraging mainstream financial institutions from engaging with crypto assets.

However, the narrative began to change as former President Donald Trump openly embraced the crypto industry, positioning himself as a pro-crypto candidate. This move by Trump forced the Biden administration to reconsider its stance, leading to a noticeable softening in rhetoric. For instance, the SEC’s potential approval of spot Ethereum Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and other positive regulatory developments indicated a shift towards a more crypto-friendly approach. This change in tone was likely influenced by the need to appeal to the growing number of crypto enthusiasts and investors who view digital assets as a significant issue in the upcoming election.

Despite the softer rhetoric, the Biden administration’s past actions reflect a tendency that some critics say are aimed at stifling the crypto industry through measures like Operation Choke Point 2.0. This initiative aimed to limit the industry’s access to traditional financial services, creating barriers for crypto businesses to operate within the established banking system. Such policies have led to accusations of bias and a deliberate attempt to hamper innovation in the crypto space, creating a complex regulatory environment that has been challenging for the industry to navigate.

As the election draws nearer, the Biden administration’s recent outreach to the crypto community and participation in discussions around crypto policy suggest a strategic pivot. This shift aims to counter Trump’s pro-crypto stance and regain the support of crypto voters. While some in the crypto industry welcome this change, others remain sceptical, viewing it as a politically motivated move rather than a genuine commitment to fostering a supportive regulatory framework for digital assets. The ongoing debate and policy developments will play a crucial role in shaping the future of crypto regulation in the United States, reflecting the high stakes of the 2024 presidential election for the crypto industry.

Donald Trump

David Bailey, the CEO of Bitcoin Magazine, has taken a prominent advisory role in Donald Trump’s campaign, aiming to shape the former president’s cryptocurrency policy. Bailey’s influence has led Trump to adopt a pro-crypto stance, marking a significant shift from his earlier scepticism. This move is largely seen as a direct response to the Biden administration’s stringent regulatory measures against the crypto industry, which many in the crypto community view as hostile and overbearing. Bailey’s strategy includes advising Trump to sign a comprehensive crypto-focused executive order on his first day in office, signalling a strong commitment to fostering a crypto-friendly environment in the U.S.

Trump’s newfound support for the crypto industry extends to the mining sector, where he has pledged to champion Bitcoin mining both domestically and on the global stage. In a meeting with major Bitcoin miners and industry leaders, Trump expressed his desire for the U.S. to become a dominant force in Bitcoin mining, emphasising the potential for energy independence and economic growth. This stance is a stark contrast to President Biden’s approach. Trump’s pro-mining rhetoric has resonated strongly within the crypto community, garnering significant support from industry leaders.

In addition to his policy proposals, Trump has actively engaged with the crypto community, even addressing the Libertarian National Convention, where he reiterated his support for digital assets and said he would free Silk Road creator Ross Ulbricht, if elected. Trump has also pledged to halt the development and implementation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), which are widely unpopular among crypto users who view them as a threat to financial privacy and decentralisation. This move has solidified his position as a pro-crypto candidate, appealing to a demographic that values financial freedom and innovation in the digital assets industry. Trump’s promise to halt the current administration’s regulatory crackdown and implement policies that encourage technological advancement has struck a chord with many crypto enthusiasts. However, scepticism remains among some crypto voters who question the sincerity of his commitment, given his prior negative statements about cryptocurrencies.

Despite the mixed reception, Trump’s pivot towards a pro-crypto agenda has undeniably made cryptocurrency a significant issue in the 2024 presidential campaign. His efforts to align with the crypto community contrast sharply with Biden’s regulatory approach, positioning Trump as a potential advocate for the industry. As the election draws nearer, the crypto community’s support could prove pivotal, especially as Trump continues to emphasise the importance of fostering innovation and positioning the U.S. as a leader in the global digital economy.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has emerged as a significant pro-crypto contender, appealing particularly to independent voters and those disenchanted with Trump & Biden’s policies. Kennedy has consistently highlighted his commitment to Bitcoin and blockchain, positioning himself as a unique advocate for digital assets in the presidential race. His campaign promises include innovative plans like placing the entire U.S. budget on the blockchain to ensure transparency and accountability in government spending. He envisions a system where every American can scrutinise budget items at any time, aiming to foster a new level of public oversight and trust.

Kennedy’s pro-crypto stance extends to his opposition to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). He has been vocal about the risks associated with CBDCs, arguing that they could lead to increased government surveillance and a loss of financial freedom for individuals. Instead, Kennedy supports backing the U.S. dollar with Bitcoin, aiming to stabilise the currency and integrate it with emerging digital assets. His proposals resonate with many crypto enthusiasts who seek a candidate willing to challenge the status quo and promote innovation in the financial sector.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has proposed an ambitious tax-free crypto policy aimed at promoting the broader adoption of Bitcoin and enhancing financial freedom. His plan involves exempting Bitcoin transactions from capital gains taxes, thereby eliminating a significant barrier for users who wish to use Bitcoin as a regular transactional currency rather than merely a speculative investment. This policy is part of Kennedy’s broader vision to integrate cryptocurrencies into the mainstream financial system, providing a robust alternative to traditional fiat currencies. By removing the tax burden on Bitcoin transactions, Kennedy believes it will encourage more people to engage with digital currencies, ultimately fostering innovation and positioning the United States as a global leader in the crypto economy.

Throughout his campaign, Kennedy has actively sought the support of the crypto community by attending major industry events and engaging directly with crypto users. He has spoken at conferences like Consensus 2024, where he emphasised his commitment to protecting transactional freedom and ensuring the U.S. remains a hub for blockchain innovation. His efforts have garnered significant attention and support from those who prioritise financial autonomy and transparency, though not all crypto voters are fully convinced of his sincerity or the feasibility of his plans.

Despite the enthusiasm, Kennedy’s campaign has faced scrutiny, particularly regarding his personal investment in Bitcoin. After initially claiming not to be an investor, financial disclosures revealed that Kennedy had purchased a substantial amount of Bitcoin. This revelation raised questions about potential conflicts of interest and the timing of his investments. While Kennedy’s campaign clarified that the investment was made after his initial statements, the incident has added a layer of complexity to his pro-crypto narrative, leaving some voters sceptical of his true intentions.

Will Crypto Have a Significant Impact on the Election Results?

The emergence of cryptocurrency as a significant political issue in the 2024 election has introduced a new dimension to the campaign landscape. The leading candidates have each taken varied stances on crypto, reflecting the growing importance of digital assets in the national economy. This development has particularly resonated with a youthful segment of tech-savvy and digitally native voters, making it a topic of considerable debate. However, the true extent of its influence on voter turnout and decision-making remains uncertain. While some segments of the population, especially those deeply invested in the crypto ecosystem, may be swayed by these discussions, it is still unclear whether this issue will mobilise a broader voter base.

As the election date of November 5, 2024, approaches, political analysts and campaign strategists are keenly observing how the crypto debate unfolds. The differing positions of candidates like Biden, Trump, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., contrast sharply with more cautious or adversarial views from each contender appealing to a unique demographic of potential voters. This divergence creates a dynamic electoral environment where the crypto issue could potentially tip the scales in closely contested regions. Nevertheless, with many other pressing issues also at play, the impact of cryptocurrency on the overall electoral outcome is difficult to predict.

Watching the events leading up to the election will be particularly fascinating for observers and participants in the crypto space. The interplay between traditional political concerns and this modern financial innovation could set new precedents for how emerging technologies influence democratic processes. Regardless of the ultimate influence on voter behaviour, the inclusion of cryptocurrency as a political issue highlights its growing relevance and the necessity for policymakers to address it comprehensively. As the election nears, the crypto community and the wider electorate will be closely monitoring candidate positions and policy proposals, eager to see how this debate shapes the future of digital finance and governance in the United States.